Comparison

ScanAble vs Lighthouse

Google Lighthouse includes an accessibility audit as part of its broader web performance toolkit. ScanAble is purpose-built for accessibility compliance. Both use axe-core under the hood, but they serve different needs.

Feature comparison

FeatureScanAbleLighthouse
Focus
Accessibility-only (deep)
Performance + SEO + a11y + PWA (broad)
WCAG coverage
WCAG 2.2 AA + best practices (full axe ruleset)
Subset of axe-core rules (~40 checks)
Compliance score
Weighted by severity (0-100)
Percentage of passing audits (0-100)
Fix instructions
Detailed per-violation with code context
Generic descriptions with links
PDF report
Professional branded PDF ($19)
No (HTML/JSON export only)
API access
REST API with key auth and metering
CLI only (no hosted API)
CI/CD integration
API call in any CI
Lighthouse CI (separate tool)
Price
Free tier (100/mo) + paid plans
Free (open source)
Additional audits
Accessibility only
Performance, SEO, PWA, best practices

Pricing comparison

TierScanAbleLighthouse
Basic useFree (100 scans/mo)Free (unlimited)
CI/CD integration$19/mo (1,000 scans)Free (self-hosted)
Bulk scanning$49-149/mo (5K-25K scans)Free (self-hosted)

Verdict

Use Lighthouse for broad site health checks during development. Use ScanAble when you need deep accessibility compliance audits, professional reports for clients or legal documentation, or API access for automated scanning at scale.

Try ScanAble free

Scan any URL for WCAG 2.2 violations. Free preview with compliance score — no signup required.

Scan My Website Free